Is it acceptable for a main motion to be introduced with a few words of explanation?

Introducing a main motion with a few words of explanation is generally considered acceptable and often encouraged in parliamentary procedure. This practice helps clarify the intent and purpose of the motion to the assembly, ensuring that members fully understand what is being proposed. Providing a brief explanation can lead to a more informed discussion and helps facilitate the decision-making process.

Often, having a concise rationale or context can illuminate the motivation behind the motion, enabling members to engage more effectively in the conversation that follows. This approach also assists in dispelling any potential confusion about the motion's contents or implications. By doing so, it promotes better communication within the meeting, fostering a more collaborative environment.

In contrast, introducing a motion without any form of explanation could lead to misunderstandings or misinterpretations, potentially hindering the group's ability to deliberate effectively. Therefore, the practice of providing a brief explanation aligns with the goal of ensuring clarity and comprehension in meetings.